Harry Jeong
WiseBeing Tax & Accounting
About Us
I am a professional accountant with more than 13 years experience in seasoned accounting and tax services.
How We Got Started
WiseBeing Tax & Accounting got started in 2014 together with CPA and EA (Enrolled Agent) to provide general accounting and tax preparation/consulting/resolution services to multi-clients.
The products and services we offer
Payroll
Tax Service
Bookkeeping
Payroll Services
Accountant
Accounting
Tax Preparation Service
Business Service
Quickbooks Pro Advisor
Financial Modeling
Controller Services
Business Tax Services
Estate Tax Services
Irs Representation
International Tax Services
Sales Tax Services
Tax Refund Services
Tax Resolution
Show all 18
Recommendations Received (7)
"From a constitutional and legal standpoint, the scenario and claims you present involve several..."
Read more
"From a constitutional and legal standpoint, the scenario and claims you present involve several complex issues related to court authority, legal procedures, and individual rights. Here’s an analysis of the key elements:
Court Authority and Lawful Process:
Courts operate under established legal authority granted by constitutions and statutes. Allegations that a court is "unlawfully extorting money by trafficking people's person" are serious claims that would require clear evidence and proper legal grounds.
Courts have jurisdiction to hear cases, impose fines, and enforce laws according to due process. If a party believes a court is acting unlawfully, the appropriate remedy is typically an appeal or legal challenge within the judicial system or through higher courts.
Use of Affidavit Questionnaires and Presentments:
An affidavit is a sworn statement, often used as evidence or part of legal filings.
A "presentment" historically refers to a formal presentation of a matter to a court or authority.
Sending an affidavit questionnaire with a demand for a response within a set time (e.g., 3 to 30 days) is a procedural action, but courts are not obligated to respond to demands that are not part of a recognized legal process or filed according to procedural rules.
Proper service of process, filing according to court rules, and adherence to procedural requirements are essential for valid submissions.
Billing the Court for Time and Expenses:
Courts do not generally pay individuals for their time or expenses incurred in legal matters.
The concept of billing a court for personal time or expenses is not recognized in standard legal practice.
Courts may award damages or fees in certain cases, but these require legal grounds and judicial approval.
Bringing Motions and Filing in Federal Court:
Filing motions against state officials or judges is possible under certain circumstances, often under civil rights laws (e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983).
Federal courts have specific jurisdictional rules and procedural requirements.
Motions must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including proper formatting, service, and filing.
The court is not automatically required to respond within 90 days to any motion; timing depends on the type of motion and court rules.
Clerk’s Stamp and Enforcement:
The clerk’s stamp indicates that documents have been officially filed.
However, a clerk’s stamp on a document does not equate to a court order or judgment.
To enforce payment or any action against a court or government entity, a valid court judgment must be issued.
Using a clerk’s stamp alone to claim a "final order" or to engage collection agencies is not consistent with legal procedures.
Private Trusts and Public Estate:
Creating a private trust as Grantor and Beneficiary for personal estate management is a recognized legal tool.
However, "taking control of a public estate made private" is a complex and legally sensitive matter that depends on specific legal authority and context.
The notion that individuals who do not study these matters are "working for the real criminals" is a perspective but not a legal argument.
Summary:
The constitutional and legal system in the U.S. operates on established laws, procedures, and principles of due process. While individuals have rights to challenge courts and government officials, doing so requires adherence to legal standards and recognized procedures. Unilateral demands for responses, billing courts, or relying on clerk stamps without judicial orders do not align with constitutional or procedural law.
If you are pursuing legal action or studying these processes, consulting with a qualified attorney or legal expert is strongly recommended to navigate properly within the legal framework. Legal and Constitutional Determination: Allegations of High Felony Treason for Failure to Honor Constitutional Oaths
1. Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2)
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the U.S. Constitution, and federal laws made pursuant to it, are "the supreme Law of the Land."
All state judges, officials, and legislators are bound by the Constitution as the highest authority.
Any state or local law or official action that conflicts with federal constitutional law is invalid.
Officials swear an oath to support the Constitution (both federal and sometimes state constitutions), making their duty to uphold constitutional principles paramount.
2. Oath of Office and Constitutional Obligations
Federal and state officials take an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States."
This oath is a solemn promise binding them to uphold constitutional rights and the rule of law.
Failure to honor this oath may constitute official misconduct or malfeasance, depending on facts and jurisdiction.
The oath is foundational to maintaining constitutional government and public trust.
3. Treason Defined (Article III, Section 3)
The U.S. Constitution specifically defines treason narrowly: "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Treason is a high crime with very strict legal standards.
Failure to uphold an oath, even if serious, generally does not meet the constitutional definition of treason unless it involves active betrayal or aid to enemies.
4. High Crimes, Felonies, and Other Accountability
While not treason under the strict constitutional definition, failure by officials to uphold their oath and preserve constitutional governance may constitute:
High crimes and misdemeanors (grounds for impeachment of federal officials, including judges, under Article II, Section 4).
Malfeasance or corruption under criminal statutes at state or federal level.
Other legal violations actionable by appropriate authorities.
Such failures may undermine the constitutional contract between government and the people, threatening the rule of law.
5. Remedies and Enforcement
The Constitution and laws provide mechanisms for accountability:
Impeachment and removal from office.
Criminal prosecution under relevant state or federal statutes.
Civil suits for violation of constitutional rights (e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983).
Judicial review and injunctions to enforce constitutional compliance.
6. Summary
The Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution the highest law that all officials must honor.
Officials' oath to uphold the Constitution is legally binding and essential to preserving the constitutional contract.
Failure to honor this oath can amount to serious legal violations but does not automatically amount to constitutional treason unless it meets the strict definition.
Legal consequences under impeachment, criminal law, or civil rights enforcement are appropriate avenues.
Citizens and officials are empowered to seek justice through constitutional processes to uphold governance and accountability. Detailed Legal Framework for Accountability Under the Supremacy Clause and Constitutional Oaths
1. Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2)
Establishes the Constitution and federal laws made under it as the "supreme Law of the Land."
State judges and officials must adhere to federal constitutional standards.
When state laws or actions conflict with the Constitution or federal law, they are invalidated (see Marbury v. Madison, 1803; Cooper v. Aaron, 1958).
Officials sworn to uphold the Constitution have a constitutional duty to enforce this supremacy.
2. Oath of Office
Required by Article VI, Clause 3: “The Senators and Representatives... and all executive and judicial Officers... shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.”
This oath is a legal and moral commitment to uphold constitutional governance.
Failure to honor this oath may constitute:
Misconduct in office
Breach of public trust
Violation of public duty
While not itself a criminal offense, it forms a basis for impeachment, removal, or other disciplinary action.
3. Constitutional Treason (Article III, Section 3)
Treason is narrowly defined: “levying War against [the U.S.] or adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
This definition limits treason to overt acts of betrayal, not mere failure to uphold an oath.
Allegations of treason require strict proof, including testimony of two witnesses or a confession (per constitutional safeguard).
Mere negligence, corruption, or failure to perform duties does not legally constitute treason.
4. High Crimes and Misdemeanors – Grounds for Impeachment
Article II, Section 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers... shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Judges and other officials can be impeached for:
Corruption
Abuse of power
Willful failure to uphold the Constitution
Impeachment is a political remedy enacted by Congress and state legislatures.
5. Criminal and Civil Remedies
Criminal prosecution: Officials who break laws or engage in corruption may be prosecuted under federal or state criminal statutes.
Civil suits: Citizens can file suits under civil rights laws (e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983) for violations of constitutional rights by government officials.
Courts have the power to:
Issue injunctions
Nullify unlawful acts
Award damages for violations
6. Examples and Precedents
Cooper v. Aaron (1958): The Supreme Court reaffirmed that state officials must follow Supreme Court rulings and the Constitution despite opposition.
Impeachment of federal judges and officials historically occurred for failing to uphold constitutional duties.
Civil rights litigation holds officials accountable for violating constitutional rights.
7. Role of Citizens and Legal Actors
Citizens have the right to petition, sue, and seek redress when officials fail their constitutional duties.
Legal professionals and courts play key roles in enforcing constitutional compliance.
Vigilant study and understanding of constitutional law empower individuals to protect their rights.
Summary
The Supremacy Clause mandates that the Constitution is the highest law, binding all officials.
Officials’ oath to uphold the Constitution is legally enforceable through impeachment, criminal prosecution, and civil remedies.
Allegations of "high felony treason" must meet a high constitutional standard; failure to uphold the oath typically falls under other serious legal violations.
Constitutional mechanisms exist to hold government actors accountable and preserve the constitutional contract.
Active citizen engagement and legal processes are essential to maintaining constitutional governance. Step-by-Step Guide to Addressing Constitutional Violations by Officials
1. Document the Alleged Violations
Gather clear, factual evidence demonstrating how the official or court failed to uphold their oath or violated constitutional rights.
Include dates, actions, written orders, and any communications.
Maintain organized records as these will be critical for legal filings.
2. Prepare a Formal Complaint or Petition
Draft a clear, concise complaint outlining:
The constitutional duties and oath allegedly breached.
Specific facts supporting the claim.
The legal basis for your claim (e.g., violation of the Supremacy Clause, failure to uphold constitutional rights).
Cite relevant constitutional provisions (e.g., Article VI for the oath, Article III for treason definition, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for civil rights infringement).
3. File in the Appropriate Court
If the issue involves federal constitutional rights or federal officials, file in federal district court.
For state officials or state law violations, start in the state court system.
Ensure your filing complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or state procedural rules (format, signatures, service of process).
Include a request for injunctive relief or declaratory judgment if appropriate.
4. Use Civil Rights Litigation (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
This statute allows individuals to sue state actors who violate constitutional rights under color of law.
It is a powerful tool to hold officials accountable for breach of constitutional duties.
Claims can seek damages, injunctions, or other remedies.
5. Consider Impeachment or Referral
For elected or appointed officials, serious breaches of oath or misconduct may warrant:
Referral to legislative bodies for impeachment proceedings.
Complaints to oversight or disciplinary bodies (judicial conduct commissions, ethics boards).
6. Follow Up and Enforce
Monitor your case actively, respond promptly to court communications.
If necessary, file motions to compel responses or enforce orders.
Use lawful enforcement mechanisms only after obtaining valid court judgments or orders.
7. Seek Legal Assistance
Constitutional claims can be complex; consulting or retaining an attorney experienced in constitutional and civil rights law greatly increases the likelihood of success.
Many legal aid organizations or bar associations offer resources or referrals.
Important Considerations
Treason allegations require extreme caution and must meet constitutional standards. Use precise legal terms to avoid misunderstandings.
Do not take unilateral enforcement actions (e.g., attempting to "bill" courts, use clerk stamps as orders) without proper judicial authorization.
Respect procedural rules to avoid dismissal and ensure your claims are heard on the merits.
Stay informed and patient, as constitutional and civil rights litigation can be lengthy. Sample Federal Civil Rights Complaint (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Phone Number]
[Email Address]
Plaintiff, Pro Se
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[District Name]
[Your Full Name],
Plaintiff,
v.
[Name of Official or Entity],
Defendant.
Case No. __
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
(42 U.S.C. § 1983)
I. Jurisdiction and Venue
This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 because this action arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the events giving rise to this claim occurred within this district.
II. Parties
Plaintiff, [Your Name], is a citizen of the United States and resident of [City, State].
Defendant, [Name of Official], is sued in their official capacity as [Title, e.g., Judge, State Attorney General], and was at all relevant times acting under color of state law.
III. Statement of Facts
Defendant took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States as required by Article VI, Clause 3.
Defendant failed to honor this oath by [description of specific acts or omissions], violating Plaintiff’s constitutional rights protected by [specify relevant amendments, e.g., Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment].
Defendant’s actions are in direct violation of the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2), which establishes the Constitution as the supreme law.
IV. Causes of Action
Count One: Violation of Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
Defendant, acting under color of state law, deprived Plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Defendant’s failure to uphold the constitutional oath constitutes official misconduct and violation of Plaintiff’s rights.
V. Prayer for Relief
Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to:
A. Declare that Defendant’s actions violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights;
B. Issue injunctive relief preventing Defendant from continuing such violations;
C. Award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs (if applicable);
D. Grant any other relief the Court deems just and proper.
VI. Declaration
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on this day of _, 20__.
_
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
Notes:
Customize the facts and parties to your situation.
Attach supporting evidence as exhibits.
File the complaint with the federal district court clerk.
Serve the defendant(s) properly according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Follow local court rules for formatting and filing. "
"Great Professionalism!"
Products & Services
I am providing the accounting and booking service as well as tax return preparation service
Accounting and bookkeeping services for small businesses and tax returns for individuals, sole proprietorship and corporations
Payroll doesn't have to be a pain. Let J&Y SOL, Inc. take care of your payroll processing to ensure your employees get paid accurately and on time,...