About Us
The products and services we offer
Products & Services
Need help with your next major home project? From renovating to rewiring to additions, we can help. Lo-Studio Architecture offers planning services...
Recommendations Given (3)
" We feel to recommend Uniware Industrial Product because we support their values, their business..."
Read more
" We feel to recommend Uniware Industrial Product because we support their values, their business goals and level of services illustrated by the following statements:
1. we guarantee our quality
2. we have our local partner for other office supplies like binder, file folder, paper etc to provide one stop purchase for our clients
3. all products are produced under ISO9001/14001 standard
4. We provide free delivery to our clients
5. As for original products, we provide as our client's requirements and with competitive price though it is not big different from other suppliers.
6. we also provide maintenance services for our client's printers, if anything wrong with printer, we can come to fix it on-site. "
Recent Activity
It sounds obvious but , usually, if you do a good job, the client (or customer) responds positively to the request of recommending your company. It is not mathematical, in a sense that one obtains collaboration all the time. However, it is very likely that you would. Unfortunately there are...
(more)
It sounds obvious but , usually, if you do a good job, the client (or customer) responds positively to the request of recommending your company. It is not mathematical, in a sense that one obtains collaboration all the time. However, it is very likely that you would. Unfortunately there are still cases in which, it does not matter how good you are, interferences might cloud the view of other regarding your performance. Competition might lead to that.
The above describes a direct review by clients or customers.
There are also other types of reviews (i.e.) through the media.
In this category there are different types of sources for the review.
Well-known magazines require submissions of material, from which they choose who and what to feature. Lately I noticed that there is a proliferation of unsolicited sources of reviews, which require payment to feature your work. There are also competitions that claim that you have won the first price and, for a fee, you can be featured on on-line publications that claim to be distributed to a vast audience. This creates a type of intellectually "cheap" review which confuses the public and put in question the validity of general recognitions.
In short, also in reviews, there is a difference between "substance" and "appearance". One has to first choose in which category one would like to belong. Then one can pursue the source. I consider direct reviews better than general ones. I believe that the public also responds better to those. Although the validity of this statement is also related to the awareness and sophistication of the audience. It is also valid that an acquired trophy should provide very little satisfaction to the person that owns it. If one should feel proud of it, this means that one has chosen "appearance" over "substance".